AI Code Editor Showdown
Zed, Cody, Continue, Morphic, OpenCode — the editors challenging Cursor for the AI-first coding crown.
What's in this pack
| # | Editor | Killer feature | Open-source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zed | Rust-native rendering, multiplayer + AI | yes (GPL) |
| 2 | Cody | code-graph context from Sourcegraph indexer | yes (Apache) |
| 3 | Continue | bring-your-own-model in VS Code / JetBrains | yes (Apache) |
| 4 | Morphic | terminal-native AI loop, no GUI overhead | yes |
| 5 | OpenCode | AGENTS.md-driven autonomous coding agent | yes |
These five are not "AI plugins on top of an editor" — they are editors (or terminal interfaces) designed around AI from the ground up. Each takes a different bet on what matters most.
Why this matters
Cursor is the dominant AI-first editor today. But "dominant" doesn't mean "best fit for everyone." Five concrete reasons people look elsewhere:
- Latency: Zed renders at 120fps, Cursor at 60fps with stutter on large repos. If you live in the editor 8 hours a day, that gap compounds.
- Model freedom: Cursor's pricing assumes you use their routed models. Continue and Cody let you point at any provider — Anthropic direct, Bedrock, your local Ollama, Together, Fireworks.
- Source-graph context: Cody indexes your monorepo and feeds the LLM real cross-file references, not just embedding similarity. For 1M+ LOC codebases, this is a different quality tier.
- Open weights and self-host: Cursor is closed. Zed, Continue, Cody, Morphic, OpenCode all run locally with auditable code — required for enterprises with strict data policies.
- Terminal-first workflows: Some engineers never leave the terminal. Morphic and OpenCode skip the GUI entirely and embed the AI loop where they already work.
Install in one command
# Install the entire showdown pack
tokrepo install pack/ai-code-editor-showdown
# Or pick the editor you want to try
tokrepo install zed
tokrepo install continue
tokrepo install cody
Each TokRepo asset page lists install instructions for macOS / Linux / Windows, the recommended starting model config, and the migration notes for moving rules and prompts from Cursor.
Common pitfalls
- Settings drift from Cursor: don't expect
.cursorrulesto work as-is. Each editor has its own rules format. The Cursor Rules Library pack documents the conversions for the most popular ones. - Continue requires model setup: it's BYOM by design, so first-run is empty. You must edit
config.jsonand add an Anthropic, OpenAI, or local provider. Many bounce here. - Cody indexer needs to run: Cody's quality advantage comes from its code graph. On a fresh repo, the first index can take 10-30 minutes. Don't judge quality before indexing finishes.
- Zed AI requires login: even though Zed is open-source, the AI panel uses Zed's hosted routing by default. Switch to direct API mode in settings if you want to BYOK.
- OpenCode's AGENTS.md is mandatory: without one in the repo, the agent has no guardrails and can wander. Treat AGENTS.md like a CLAUDE.md.
When this pack alone isn't enough
This pack is about editors. If you also want to compare the four big hosted coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor's own agent mode, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI), see the AI Coding Agents Compared pack — that one is the orthogonal axis. Most engineers eventually use both: an editor for interactive work and a hosted agent for long-running tasks.
After picking your editor, layer the Cursor Rules Library pack to drop in proven .cursorrules / .continuerules / AGENTS.md files for Python, React, Go, and engineer-mode operation. The editor sets the surface; the rules set the policy.
A common 2026 setup: Zed as the daily driver, Continue as a VS Code fallback for legacy debugging, Cody indexing the monorepo in the background, Claude Code on the side for autonomous refactors. Pack-level install means swapping out one of these is a single command, not a weekend.
5 assets in this pack
Frequently asked questions
Are these editors free?
Zed, Continue, Cody (community tier), Morphic, and OpenCode are all open-source and free to install. Hosted features cost: Cody Pro is paid, Zed has hosted AI routing, Continue is free but you pay your own model bill. The biggest 'free' win is bring-your-own-key — a typical Claude Sonnet bill via Continue runs $20-50/month for an active dev, often less than Cursor Pro.
Zed vs Cursor — which is faster in practice?
Zed is genuinely faster on raw editing — it's Rust-native and built on a custom GPU renderer. Cursor stutters on large repos that Zed handles smoothly. The catch: Cursor's AI features are more polished today (better tab completion, smoother chat). If editing latency matters more than AI polish, switch. If you live in chat, Cursor still wins on features.
Will Cursor rules work in Continue or Zed?
Not directly. Each editor has its own rules format: Cursor uses .cursorrules / .cursor/rules/*.mdc, Continue uses ~/.continue/config.json, Zed uses assistant_panel config, OpenCode uses AGENTS.md. The Cursor Rules Library pack ships the same rules in each format so you can swap editors without rewriting.
How does this pack differ from AI Coding Agents Compared?
This pack is editor-first — IDEs and terminals where you sit and write code. AI Coding Agents Compared covers the four hosted agents (Claude Code, Cursor agent, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI) that run autonomously. They're orthogonal: most teams use an editor for interactive work and an agent for long tasks. Install both packs if you want the full picture.
What's the operational gotcha when switching from Cursor?
Forgetting that your .cursor folder, project rules, and chat history don't follow you. Plan a migration day: export Cursor rules, convert to the new format (TokRepo's pack handles this), set up new model config, re-add MCP servers. Engineers who switch in 30 minutes between meetings end up frustrated; budget a half-day for a clean handoff.
12 packs · 80+ hand-picked assets
Browse every curated bundle on the home page
Back to all packs