TOKREPO · ARSENAL
New · this week

AI Code Editor Showdown

Zed, Cody, Continue, Morphic, OpenCode — the editors challenging Cursor for the AI-first coding crown.

5 assets

What's in this pack

# Editor Killer feature Open-source
1 Zed Rust-native rendering, multiplayer + AI yes (GPL)
2 Cody code-graph context from Sourcegraph indexer yes (Apache)
3 Continue bring-your-own-model in VS Code / JetBrains yes (Apache)
4 Morphic terminal-native AI loop, no GUI overhead yes
5 OpenCode AGENTS.md-driven autonomous coding agent yes

These five are not "AI plugins on top of an editor" — they are editors (or terminal interfaces) designed around AI from the ground up. Each takes a different bet on what matters most.

Why this matters

Cursor is the dominant AI-first editor today. But "dominant" doesn't mean "best fit for everyone." Five concrete reasons people look elsewhere:

  1. Latency: Zed renders at 120fps, Cursor at 60fps with stutter on large repos. If you live in the editor 8 hours a day, that gap compounds.
  2. Model freedom: Cursor's pricing assumes you use their routed models. Continue and Cody let you point at any provider — Anthropic direct, Bedrock, your local Ollama, Together, Fireworks.
  3. Source-graph context: Cody indexes your monorepo and feeds the LLM real cross-file references, not just embedding similarity. For 1M+ LOC codebases, this is a different quality tier.
  4. Open weights and self-host: Cursor is closed. Zed, Continue, Cody, Morphic, OpenCode all run locally with auditable code — required for enterprises with strict data policies.
  5. Terminal-first workflows: Some engineers never leave the terminal. Morphic and OpenCode skip the GUI entirely and embed the AI loop where they already work.

Install in one command

# Install the entire showdown pack
tokrepo install pack/ai-code-editor-showdown

# Or pick the editor you want to try
tokrepo install zed
tokrepo install continue
tokrepo install cody

Each TokRepo asset page lists install instructions for macOS / Linux / Windows, the recommended starting model config, and the migration notes for moving rules and prompts from Cursor.

Common pitfalls

  • Settings drift from Cursor: don't expect .cursorrules to work as-is. Each editor has its own rules format. The Cursor Rules Library pack documents the conversions for the most popular ones.
  • Continue requires model setup: it's BYOM by design, so first-run is empty. You must edit config.json and add an Anthropic, OpenAI, or local provider. Many bounce here.
  • Cody indexer needs to run: Cody's quality advantage comes from its code graph. On a fresh repo, the first index can take 10-30 minutes. Don't judge quality before indexing finishes.
  • Zed AI requires login: even though Zed is open-source, the AI panel uses Zed's hosted routing by default. Switch to direct API mode in settings if you want to BYOK.
  • OpenCode's AGENTS.md is mandatory: without one in the repo, the agent has no guardrails and can wander. Treat AGENTS.md like a CLAUDE.md.

When this pack alone isn't enough

This pack is about editors. If you also want to compare the four big hosted coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor's own agent mode, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI), see the AI Coding Agents Compared pack — that one is the orthogonal axis. Most engineers eventually use both: an editor for interactive work and a hosted agent for long-running tasks.

After picking your editor, layer the Cursor Rules Library pack to drop in proven .cursorrules / .continuerules / AGENTS.md files for Python, React, Go, and engineer-mode operation. The editor sets the surface; the rules set the policy.

A common 2026 setup: Zed as the daily driver, Continue as a VS Code fallback for legacy debugging, Cody indexing the monorepo in the background, Claude Code on the side for autonomous refactors. Pack-level install means swapping out one of these is a single command, not a weekend.

INSTALL · ONE COMMAND
$ tokrepo install pack/ai-code-editor-showdown
hand it to your agent — or paste it in your terminal
What's inside

5 assets in this pack

Config#01
Zed — High-Performance AI Code Editor

GPU-accelerated editor built in Rust with multiplayer editing and built-in AI assistant. By the creators of Atom. 78K+ stars.

by TokRepo Curated·130 views
$ tokrepo install zed-high-performance-ai-code-editor-e17aff9c
Config#02
Cody by Sourcegraph — AI with Full Codebase Context

AI code assistant that understands your entire codebase. Chat, completions, edits, and deep search across repos. Enterprise-grade.

by AI Open Source·104 views
$ tokrepo install cody-sourcegraph-ai-full-codebase-context-c00d464a
Script#03
Continue — Open-Source AI Code Assistant

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains. Tab autocomplete, chat, inline editing with any model — OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, or self-hosted.

by Continue·105 views
$ tokrepo install continue-open-source-ai-code-assistant-8040c0e5
Prompt#04
Morphic — Open-Source AI Answer Engine

Perplexity-style AI search with generative UI. Multiple LLM and search providers. Self-hostable with Next.js. 8.7K+ stars.

by Prompt Lab·137 views
$ tokrepo install morphic-open-source-ai-answer-engine-a7a38f07
Script#05
OpenCode — Open-Source AI Coding Agent for Terminal

Open-source AI coding agent with 140K+ stars. TUI-first design, LSP integration, works with Claude, OpenAI, Google, or local models. Two built-in agents: build and plan. MIT license.

by AI Open Source·153 views
$ tokrepo install opencode-open-source-ai-coding-agent-terminal-4374a5c2
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Are these editors free?

Zed, Continue, Cody (community tier), Morphic, and OpenCode are all open-source and free to install. Hosted features cost: Cody Pro is paid, Zed has hosted AI routing, Continue is free but you pay your own model bill. The biggest 'free' win is bring-your-own-key — a typical Claude Sonnet bill via Continue runs $20-50/month for an active dev, often less than Cursor Pro.

Zed vs Cursor — which is faster in practice?

Zed is genuinely faster on raw editing — it's Rust-native and built on a custom GPU renderer. Cursor stutters on large repos that Zed handles smoothly. The catch: Cursor's AI features are more polished today (better tab completion, smoother chat). If editing latency matters more than AI polish, switch. If you live in chat, Cursor still wins on features.

Will Cursor rules work in Continue or Zed?

Not directly. Each editor has its own rules format: Cursor uses .cursorrules / .cursor/rules/*.mdc, Continue uses ~/.continue/config.json, Zed uses assistant_panel config, OpenCode uses AGENTS.md. The Cursor Rules Library pack ships the same rules in each format so you can swap editors without rewriting.

How does this pack differ from AI Coding Agents Compared?

This pack is editor-first — IDEs and terminals where you sit and write code. AI Coding Agents Compared covers the four hosted agents (Claude Code, Cursor agent, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI) that run autonomously. They're orthogonal: most teams use an editor for interactive work and an agent for long tasks. Install both packs if you want the full picture.

What's the operational gotcha when switching from Cursor?

Forgetting that your .cursor folder, project rules, and chat history don't follow you. Plan a migration day: export Cursor rules, convert to the new format (TokRepo's pack handles this), set up new model config, re-add MCP servers. Engineers who switch in 30 minutes between meetings end up frustrated; budget a half-day for a clean handoff.

MORE FROM THE ARSENAL

12 packs · 80+ hand-picked assets

Browse every curated bundle on the home page

Back to all packs