PromptsApr 7, 2026·3 min read

AI Agent Design Patterns — Architecture Guide 2026

Catalog of proven design patterns for building AI agents: ReAct, Plan-and-Execute, Reflection, Tool Use, Multi-Agent, Human-in-the-Loop, and more. With architecture diagrams and code examples.

PR
Prompt Lab · Community
Quick Use

Use it first, then decide how deep to go

This block should tell both the user and the agent what to copy, install, and apply first.

Choose your pattern based on task complexity:

| Task Type | Pattern | When | |-----------|---------|------| | Simple Q&A with tools | ReAct | Most common starting point | | Multi-step projects | Plan-and-Execute | Complex tasks needing planning | | Quality-sensitive output | Reflection | When first attempt is not enough | | Team-like workflows | Multi-Agent | Specialist roles needed | | Production safety | Human-in-the-Loop | High-stakes decisions | | Autonomous coding | Code Agent | Write and run code |


Intro

AI agent systems have evolved from simple prompt-response chains to sophisticated architectures with planning, tool use, reflection, and multi-agent collaboration. This guide catalogs the 8 proven design patterns that power production agent systems in 2026 — from the foundational ReAct loop to advanced multi-agent orchestration. Each pattern includes when to use it, architecture diagrams, and implementation examples. Best for developers designing agent systems who need to choose the right architecture. Works with: any LLM framework.


Pattern 1: ReAct (Reason + Act)

The foundational agent pattern. Think, then act, then observe.

Loop:
  1. Thought: "I need to find the user's order status"
  2. Action: call get_order_status(order_id="12345")
  3. Observation: "Order shipped, tracking: UPS123"
  4. Thought: "I have the answer"
  5. Final Answer: "Your order was shipped. Tracking: UPS123"

When: Single-step tool use, Q&A with data lookup.

result = agent.run("What is the status of order 12345?",
    tools=[get_order_status, search_products])

Pattern 2: Plan-and-Execute

Separate planning from execution for complex tasks.

1. PLAN: Break task into steps
   - Step 1: Analyze current database schema
   - Step 2: Design new tables for feature X
   - Step 3: Write migration scripts
   - Step 4: Update API endpoints
   - Step 5: Add tests

2. EXECUTE: Run each step
   - [Step 1] Reading schema... done
   - [Step 2] Designing tables... done
   - ...

3. REPLAN: Adjust if needed
   - Step 3 revealed a dependency -> add Step 3.5

When: Multi-file code changes, research tasks, project-level work.

Pattern 3: Reflection

Agent reviews and improves its own output.

1. Generate: Write first draft of code
2. Reflect: Review for bugs, edge cases, style
3. Improve: Fix identified issues
4. Reflect again: Check improvements
5. Final: Output polished result

When: Code generation, writing, any quality-sensitive output.

draft = agent.generate(task)
critique = agent.reflect(draft, criteria=["correctness", "style", "edge_cases"])
final = agent.improve(draft, critique)

Pattern 4: Tool Use

Agent selects and uses external tools to accomplish tasks.

Available tools:
  - search_web(query) -> results
  - run_sql(query) -> data
  - send_email(to, subject, body)
  - create_file(path, content)

Agent decides which tool(s) to call based on the task.

When: Any task requiring external data or actions. Foundation of most agents.

Pattern 5: Multi-Agent

Multiple specialized agents collaborate.

Supervisor Agent
  -> Research Agent (web search, data gathering)
  -> Coding Agent (write code, run tests)
  -> Review Agent (check quality, security)
  -> Deploy Agent (CI/CD, monitoring)

Frameworks: CrewAI, AutoGen, LangGraph, Mastra.

When: Complex workflows with distinct specialist roles.

Pattern 6: Human-in-the-Loop

Agent pauses for human approval at critical points.

Agent: "I plan to delete the old database table. Approve? [Y/N]"
Human: "Y"
Agent: proceeds with deletion

Agent: "I want to send this email to 500 customers. Approve?"
Human: "N - change the subject line first"
Agent: revises and asks again

When: Destructive operations, external communications, financial transactions.

Pattern 7: Code Agent

Agent writes and executes code to solve problems.

Task: "Analyze this CSV and find outliers"

Agent writes Python:
  import pandas as pd
  df = pd.read_csv("data.csv")
  outliers = df[df["value"] > df["value"].mean() + 2*df["value"].std()]
  print(f"Found {len(outliers)} outliers")

Agent executes the code and returns results.

Frameworks: Smolagents (Code Agent mode), OpenHands.

When: Data analysis, math, any task where code is more precise than natural language.

Pattern 8: Memory-Augmented

Agent stores and retrieves memories across sessions.

Session 1: "We decided to use PostgreSQL for this project"
  -> Stored in memory

Session 2: "Set up the database"
  -> Recalls: "We chose PostgreSQL"
  -> Acts accordingly

Tools: Engram, Mem0, CLAUDE.md files.

When: Long-running projects, personalized assistants, knowledge management.

Choosing the Right Pattern

Simple question + tool? -> ReAct
Complex multi-step? -> Plan-and-Execute
Quality matters? -> Add Reflection
Multiple specialists? -> Multi-Agent
Safety critical? -> Add Human-in-the-Loop
Data/math heavy? -> Code Agent
Cross-session context? -> Memory-Augmented

Most production agents combine 2-3 patterns.

FAQ

Q: Which pattern should I start with? A: ReAct + Tool Use. It covers 80% of use cases. Add other patterns as needed.

Q: Can I combine patterns? A: Yes, most production agents use 2-3 patterns. Example: Plan-and-Execute + Reflection + Human-in-the-Loop.

Q: Which frameworks implement these patterns? A: LangGraph (all patterns), CrewAI (Multi-Agent), AutoGen (Multi-Agent), Smolagents (Code Agent), Claude Code (ReAct + Plan-and-Execute + Tool Use).


🙏

Source & Thanks

Synthesized from LangChain, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Microsoft research on agent architectures.

Related: CrewAI, AutoGen, LangGraph, Smolagents, Engram

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Related Assets