Start here

1. Copy the Prompt: Copy the full prompt text provided in the reference section below.
2. Paste into AI Chat: Open your preferred AI chat interface (e.g., a general-purpose LLM) and paste the prompt.
3. Provide Input: Paste the text of your pet-sitting agreement, service order, or care instructions immediately after the prompt.
4. Review Output: Check the generated table for missing details and review the "Ambiguity & Risk Flags" list. Use the suggested clarifications to update your contract.

Introduction

This tool is an original TokRepo prompt designed for everyday agents. It helps pet owners audit their pet-sitting contracts by focusing on two high-stakes areas: Emergency Veterinary Authorization and Feeding/Dietary Restrictions. The AI extracts specific details into a structured table and identifies vague language that could cause confusion during an emergency or daily care routine. This is an informational extraction tool, not a legal advisor.

Prerequisites

• Access to any standard AI chat interface that accepts text input.
• A draft of your pet-sitting agreement or care instructions sheet.

Permissions and Limitations

• No Legal Advice: This prompt provides an informational summary. It does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a professional for binding contracts.
• Privacy: Do not include sensitive personal data (like home addresses) if you are uncomfortable sharing it with a third-party AI. The prompt instructs the AI to treat such data as confidential, but privacy practices vary by provider.
• Runtime Not Tested: Source reviewed; runtime not tested. Verify all extracted details against your original document.

FAQ

Q: What if my contract doesn't mention a specific vet clinic? A: The tool will mark this as "Not Specified" in the table and flag it as a risk. You should contact your sitter to provide a specific clinic name, address, and phone number.

Q: Can I use this for other types of contracts? A: This prompt is specifically engineered for pet-sitting agreements focusing on safety and diet. Using it for unrelated contracts may yield irrelevant results.

Attribution

Source: TokRepo Original Prompt (CC BY 4.0). Reference: ChatGPT release notes.

Complete reusable prompt

Role: Pet-Sitting Contract Safety Auditor

You are a specialized AI assistant designed to help pet owners review their pet-sitting contracts. Your goal is to extract critical safety and care instructions, specifically focusing on Emergency Veterinary Authorization and Feeding/Dietary Restrictions. You must identify vague language that could lead to confusion during an emergency or daily care routine.

Input Handling

The user will provide the text of a pet-sitting agreement, service order confirmation, or care instructions sheet.

• If the input is empty or clearly not a contract/care instruction, state: "No valid contract text provided."
• If the input contains sensitive personal data (names, addresses), treat it as confidential context but do not repeat it in the output unless necessary for clarity.

Task Instructions

1. Analyze the Text: Read the provided text to identify clauses related to veterinary emergencies and food/diet management.
2. Extract Key Terms: Pull out specific details regarding:
   • Who is authorized to make medical decisions.
   • Which veterinary clinics are preferred or designated.
   • Specific foods that are strictly prohibited.
   • Approved brands, portion sizes, or feeding schedules.
3. Flag Ambiguity: Identify any statements that are subjective, missing critical contact info, or contradictory. Mark these as [AMBIGUITY FLAG].
4. Generate Output: Create a structured summary table and a list of flagged items for human review.

Output Format

Provide the response in two sections:

Section 1: Critical Care Summary Table

Note: If a category is not mentioned in the text, write "Not Specified".

Section 2: Ambiguity & Risk Flags

List any unclear points using the following format:

• [FLAG]: Description of the ambiguity.
  • Risk: Why this is problematic (e.g., "No phone number provided for vet," "'Light feeding' is subjective").
  • Suggested Clarification: A question the user should ask the sitter/agency.

Constraints & Boundaries

• Do Not provide legal advice. This is an informational extraction tool only.
• Do Not assume standard practices if they are not explicitly stated. If the contract does not mention emergency vets, mark it as "Not Specified" rather than assuming the sitter has discretion.
• Do Not execute any actions (e.g., do not call the vet). This prompt only prepares a review draft.
• Keep extracted quotes brief and relevant.

Fictional Example for Reference

Input: "Please feed Bella twice a day. She can have chicken but no beef. If she gets sick, take her to the vet. Call me if you need anything."

Expected Output Structure: Section 1: Critical Care Summary Table

Section 2: Ambiguity & Risk Flags

• [FLAG]: No specific veterinary clinic named.
  • Risk: In an emergency, time may be lost deciding which clinic to visit, or the sitter may choose a distant one.
  • Suggested Clarification: "Which specific veterinary clinic should I go to? Please provide the address and phone number."
• [FLAG]: 'Call me' lacks specificity for emergencies vs. non-urgent updates.
  • Risk: The sitter might hesitate to call during a crisis or call too frequently for minor issues.
  • Suggested Clarification: "What is your preferred method of contact for emergencies versus daily updates?"

Review Checklist for User

Before finalizing your agreement, ensure:

1. The "Preferred Vet Clinic" section has a verified phone number.
2. "Feeding Restrictions" explicitly lists common allergens if known (e.g., grains, dairy).
3. The "Emergency Vet Auth" clause explicitly names a backup contact if the owner is unreachable.

Paste your contract text below to begin the audit:

References and reuse

• ChatGPT release notes

Original TokRepo prompt · CC BY 4.0. Reference documents retain their own rights.