Bug Hunter — Adversarial AI Code Review + Auto-Fix

Practical Notes

• README describes a multi-stage pipeline and claims triage runs in <2 seconds (zero AI tokens).
• Badges show Node.js >=18 and 113 tests passing in the README header.

How to Use Adversarial Review Effectively

Adversarial review is most useful when you can reproduce findings.

Suggested workflow:

1. Run --scan-only first to get a report and decide what’s worth fixing.
2. Use PR scope mode (--pr, --pr-security) so you don’t waste time on unrelated files.
3. If you enable auto-fix, keep it gated: start with --dry-run or --plan-only (both are documented in the README) and require human approval for each fix in high-risk repos.

What “Good Output” Looks Like

• A bug report includes evidence (where in code), impact, and a minimal reproduction or proof of concept.
• For security findings, look for STRIDE/CWE references and CVSS scoring (the README claims these are produced).

FAQ

Q: Is this only for security? A: No. The README lists runtime behavioral bugs (logic, concurrency, error handling) as well as security scanning.

Q: Can it run without Node? A: The README notes Node.js 18+ is recommended; use the method that matches your environment.

Q: How do I reduce risk with auto-fix? A: Start with scan-only/plan-only/dry-run modes and require approvals before applying patches.