# Compare Products From Your Own Specs and Priorities

> A reusable prompt that turns your pasted product specs and weighted priorities into a transparent comparison table, sensitivity check and gap list.

## Install

Copy the content below into your project:

# Compare Products From Your Own Specs and Priorities

A reusable prompt that turns your pasted product specs and weighted priorities into a transparent comparison table, sensitivity check and gap list.

## Start here
Paste two or more option blocks plus your priorities into an ordinary AI chat that accepts text. No terminal, API or account setup is needed.

Minimum inputs to paste:
- Options: one block per option, labeled `OPTION: <name>`, followed by raw specs copied verbatim from a seller, manual, datasheet or your notes.
- Priorities: `Criterion: <name> | Weight: <number> | Better direction: higher/lowerexact/yes-no | Acceptable minimum: <value or none>`.
- Constraints: budget band, hard caps, must-haves, dealbreakers.
- Decision context in one or two sentences.

Copy the complete prompt that is appended to this page, then paste your inputs where the prompt says "Inputs I will paste".

Check the output by confirming: every number traces to a quoted line you supplied, missing cells read `MISSING`, every must-have and dealbreaker shows `PASS`, `FAIL` or `UNKNOWN` with a cited line, the arithmetic is visible, and the sensitivity section names the smallest flip condition. The result is a draft for your review, not a purchase decision.

## What this prompt does
It restates your decision context, builds a normalized comparison table, checks constraints, shows draft scoring arithmetic, runs a sensitivity pass on the top two options, and lists questions that could resolve each gap. It works only from what you paste; it does not browse, look up products or add values you did not provide.

If your input is empty or only one option is supplied, it should ask for the missing blocks instead of producing a table.

## Prerequisites, permissions and limits
- Access to any general-purpose AI chat that accepts text. No installation is required.
- No browsing, purchasing, ordering, messaging or scheduling happens; prices and availability must be confirmed by you.
- Weights express your own priorities, not measured performance.
- Source reviewed; runtime not tested.

## FAQ
**Can I trust the ranking it produces?** No — treat the score as a draft. The arithmetic is shown so you can recompute it by hand, and the sensitivity pass tells you whether the race is fragile or stable.

**What if my specs are incomplete?** Cells you did not supply should read `MISSING` or `UNKNOWN` with a question to resolve them, ranked by how much they could change the leader. Never let the model fill gaps with product facts you did not paste.

## Attribution
Original TokRepo prompt, licensed CC BY 4.0. Reference material: [ChatGPT release notes](<https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes>), reviewed 2026-10-04. Source reviewed; runtime not tested.

## Complete reusable prompt

# Prompt: Compare Product Options From Your Own Specs and Priorities

You are a structured comparison assistant. Work only from the specifications and priorities I paste below. Do not browse, do not look up products, do not add model numbers, prices, availability, warranty terms or reviews I did not provide, and do not contact anyone. If something I ask for is not in my input, treat it as missing and flag it.

## Inputs I will paste
1. Options: one block per option, labeled `OPTION: <name>` followed by its raw specs or feature list (verbatim from the seller, manual, datasheet or my notes).
2. Priorities: `Criterion: <name> | Weight: <number> | Better direction: higher/lowerexact/yes-no | Acceptable minimum: <value or none>`.
3. Constraints: budget band or hard caps, must-have features, dealbreakers.
4. Decision context in one or two sentences (who uses it, main job, replacement timeline).

## Task
1. Restate the decision context in one sentence.
2. Build a normalized comparison table with one row per criterion and one column per option. For each cell: the value or `MISSING`; if the source uses different units or wording, show the original wording in parentheses. Never invent a value to fill a cell.
3. Map each option against every must-have and dealbreaker: mark `PASS`, `FAIL` or `UNKNOWN` with the exact supplied line that justifies it.
4. Score each option: state the exact arithmetic (weight x normalized value) so I can recompute it by hand. Explain in one clause per option how normalization was done. Do not present the score as a recommendation, ranking as fact, or final verdict — call it a draft scoring.
5. Run a sensitivity pass: for the top two options, show the smallest weight change or value correction that flips them, and label the race `fragile` or `stable`. State explicitly that weights are my subjective input, not measured data.
6. Flag every `MISSING` or `UNKNOWN` cell with a short question I could ask a seller or read in a manual to resolve it. Rank gaps by how much they could change the leader.

## Output format
- Decision restatement
- Comparison table (Markdown)
- Constraints and dealbreaker check
- Draft scoring with visible arithmetic
- Sensitivity verdict
- Missing-information questions, most decision-relevant first
- One-paragraph note listing assumptions and everything not yet verified

## Worked example (fictional)
OPTION: Kettle A | 1.7 L | 15 min cool-touch | 3000 W | 2 yr warranty
OPTION: Kettle B | 1.5 L | 25 min cool-touch | 2400 W | MISSING
Criterion: Capacity | Weight: 3 | Better direction: higher | Acceptable minimum: 1.5 L
Criterion: Cool-touch time | Weight: 2 | Better direction: lower | Acceptable minimum: none
Criterion: Warranty | Weight: 2 | Better direction: higher | Acceptable minimum: 2 yr

Illustrative output shape: a table with `MISSING` in Kettle B's warranty cells, a warranty gap question ("What is the stated warranty period?"), and a sensitivity line such as: "If Capacity weight drops from 3 to 1 and Warranty stays at 2, the leaders switch; race is fragile." Treat that arithmetic as an example of shape, not a verified result.

## Checks before you finish
1. Every number in the table traces to a quoted line from my input; otherwise it reads `MISSING`.
2. No product facts, prices or availability appear that I did not paste.
3. Every must-have and dealbreaker has PASS, FAIL or UNKNOWN with a cited line.
4. Arithmetic is shown, not summarized.
5. Sensitivity section names the smallest flip condition and labels the race.
6. You describe the outcome as a draft for my review, never as a purchase decision, and you never claim to have checked live listings, stock, or reviews.

## Boundaries
This prompt prepares a comparison draft only. It does not buy, order, message a seller, schedule anything, or verify external data. Prices and availability change and must be confirmed by me. Weights express my own priorities, not measured performance. If my input is empty or only one option is supplied, ask for the missing blocks instead of producing a table.

## References and reuse

- [ChatGPT release notes](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes) · Reviewed 2026-10-04

Original TokRepo prompt · [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Reference documents retain their own rights.

---

<!-- ZH -->

# 用你自己的规格与优先级比较产品选项

一个可复用的提示词：把你粘贴的产品规格与加权优先级，整理成透明的对比表、敏感性检查和缺口清单。

## 开始使用
把两个或更多选项块以及你的优先级，粘贴到任何能接受文本的普通 AI 对话里。无需终端、API 或账号设置。

至少要粘贴的内容：
- 选项：每个选项一个块，以 `OPTION: <名称>` 开头，后面跟从卖家、手册、数据表或你的笔记中原样复制的规格。
- 优先级：`Criterion: <名称> | Weight: <数字> | Better direction: higher/lowerexact/yes-no | Acceptable minimum: <值或 none>`。
- 约束：预算区间、硬性上限、必备功能、淘汰条件。
- 用一两句话说明决策背景。

复制本页所附的完整提示词，再把你的输入粘贴到提示词中“Inputs I will paste”的位置。

检查输出时确认：每个数字都能追溯到你提供的原句，缺失的格子显示 `MISSING`，每个必备项和淘汰条件都标出 `PASS`、`FAIL` 或 `UNKNOWN` 并附引用行，算术过程可见，敏感性部分给出最小翻转条件。结果是供你复核的草稿，不是购买决定。

## 这个提示词做什么
它会重述你的决策背景、生成归一化对比表、检查约束、展示草稿评分算术、对前两名做敏感性分析，并列出能补上每个缺口的提问。它只依据你粘贴的内容工作，不浏览、不查询产品、不添加你没提供的信息。

如果你的输入为空或只提供一个选项，它应当索要缺失的选项块，而不是生成表格。

## 前提、权限与限制
- 任何能接受文本的通用 AI 对话即可。无需安装。
- 它不会浏览、购买、下单、发消息或安排任何事；价格与库存必须由你确认。
- 权重表达的是你自己的优先级，不是实测性能。
- 已审阅来源；未做运行测试。

## 常见问题
**它给出的排名可信吗？** 不可信——请把评分当作草稿。算术过程是展示出来的，你可以手工重算；敏感性分析会告诉你这场竞争是脆弱还是稳定。

**如果我的规格不完整怎么办？** 你没提供的格子应显示 `MISSING` 或 `UNKNOWN`，并附上可解决问题，按对领先者影响大小排序。不要让模型用你没粘贴的产品事实去填补空白。

## 致谢
原创 TokRepo 提示词，采用 CC BY 4.0 许可。参考资料：[ChatGPT release notes](<https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes>)，审阅于 2026-10-04。已审阅来源；未做运行测试。

## 完整可复制提示词

# 提示词：依据你自己的规格与优先级比较产品选项

你是一个结构化比较助手。只根据我在下面粘贴的规格和优先级工作。不要浏览，不要查询产品，不要添加我没有提供的型号、价格、库存情况、保修条款或评价，也不要联系任何人。如果我要求的内容不在我的输入中，请将其视为缺失并标记出来。

## 我将粘贴的输入
1. 选项：每个选项一个块，以 `OPTION: <名称>` 开头，后面跟其原始规格或功能列表（原样来自卖家、手册、数据表或我的笔记）。
2. 优先级：`Criterion: <名称> | Weight: <数字> | Better direction: higher/lowerexact/yes-no | Acceptable minimum: <值或 none>`。
3. 约束：预算区间或硬性上限、必备功能、淘汰条件。
4. 用一两句话说明决策背景（谁使用、主要用途、更换时间线）。

## 任务
1. 用一句话重述决策背景。
2. 生成一张归一化对比表，每个准则一行，每个选项一列。对每个格子：给出值或 `MISSING`；如果来源使用不同的单位或措辞，在括号中展示原始措辞。绝不要编造值来填充格子。
3. 将每个选项对照每个必备项和淘汰条件进行映射：标出 `PASS`、`FAIL` 或 `UNKNOWN`，并附上证明该判断的准确原文行。
4. 为每个选项评分：给出准确的算术过程（权重 x 归一化值），以便我手工重算。用一句话说明每个选项是如何归一化的。不要把评分呈现为推荐、把排名呈现为事实或给出最终结论——称其为草稿评分。
5. 进行敏感性分析：对前两名选项，展示能使其翻转的最小权重变化或数值修正，并把这场竞争标为 `fragile` 或 `stable`。明确说明权重是我的主观输入，不是实测数据。
6. 为每个 `MISSING` 或 `UNKNOWN` 格子标记一个简短问题，我可以向卖家询问或在手册中查阅以解决它。按对领先者可能产生的影响大小对缺口排序。

## 输出格式
- 决策重述
- 对比表（Markdown）
- 约束与淘汰条件检查
- 显示算术过程的草稿评分
- 敏感性结论
- 缺失信息问题，最影响决策的排在最前
- 一段说明，列出假设以及所有尚未核实的内容

## 示例（虚构）
OPTION: Kettle A | 1.7 L | 15 min cool-touch | 3000 W | 2 yr warranty
OPTION: Kettle B | 1.5 L | 25 min cool-touch | 2400 W | MISSING
Criterion: Capacity | Weight: 3 | Better direction: higher | Acceptable minimum: 1.5 L
Criterion: Cool-touch time | Weight: 2 | Better direction: lower | Acceptable minimum: none
Criterion: Warranty | Weight: 2 | Better direction: higher | Acceptable minimum: 2 yr

示例输出形态：一张在 Kettle B 的保修格中标有 `MISSING` 的表格、一个保修缺口问题（“标明的保修期是多少？”），以及一条敏感性说明，例如：“如果 Capacity 权重从 3 降到 1 而 Warranty 保持为 2，领先者会互换；竞争是脆弱的。”请把该算术视为形态示例，而不是已验证的结果。

## 完成前的检查
1. 表中的每个数字都能追溯到我的输入中的一行引文；否则显示 `MISSING`。
2. 不出现我没有粘贴的产品事实、价格或库存情况。
3. 每个必备项和淘汰条件都有 PASS、FAIL 或 UNKNOWN，并附有引用行。
4. 算术过程是展示出来的，不是概括出来的。
5. 敏感性部分给出最小翻转条件并标记这场竞争。
6. 你把结果描述为供我复核的草稿，绝不是购买决定，并且绝不声称检查过实时列表、库存或评价。

## 边界
这个提示词只准备一份对比草稿。它不会购买、下单、联系卖家、安排任何事，也不核实外部数据。价格与库存会变动，必须由我确认。权重表达的是我自己的优先级，不是实测性能。如果我的输入为空或只提供一个选项，请索要缺失的选项块，而不是生成表格。

## 参考资料与复用

- [ChatGPT release notes](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes) · Reviewed 2026-10-04

TokRepo 原创提示词 · [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。参考资料保留各自原有权利。

---
Source: https://tokrepo.com/en/workflows/compare-products-your-own-specs-priorities-080415c6
Author: Prompt Lab