# Lesson-Planning AI Workflow With Human Review Gates

> A reusable prompt that turns your own lesson details into a workflow showing what an AI may draft and what you must personally decide.

## Install

Copy the content below into your project:

# Lesson-Planning AI Workflow With Human Review Gates

A reusable prompt that turns your own lesson details into a workflow showing what an AI may draft and what you must personally decide.

## Start here

Gather your lesson details before you open a chat: topic and learners, duration, your goals in your own words, real materials and constraints, any shareable student needs, your assessment plan (or "not decided"), and what you find hardest.

Paste the prompt into the message box of an ordinary AI chat that accepts text, then paste your lesson details below the heading "MY INPUT". Send it as one message. No terminal, install, or account connection is needed.

Check the output against your own input: every missing fact should read UNKNOWN or appear as a question, never as a guess. Assessment format and student-need decisions must sit on the human side, and the privacy note must be present without claiming the AI can access your accounts, files, or class records.

## What this prompt does

It converts your raw lesson notes into a documented workflow with six parts: a snapshot paragraph, a workflow table (Step number | Step name | What the AI may draft | What I must personally review or decide | Why that gate belongs to me | Input needed from me), a human-only checklist, an AI-draftable list with the input each draft needs, open questions, and a privacy note.

The table is the point: each of 6-10 steps covering planning, materials, differentiation, assessment, and post-lesson review names both the draftable part and the part that stays yours.

## Before you paste

- Use only student information you are allowed to share. Remove names and diagnoses first, or leave that item out.
- Treat the input as private to you and your school's rules; the prompt tells the model not to repeat personal data in its output.
- This is a text planning aid. It does not schedule work, send messages, or reach your accounts, files, or class records.
- Source reviewed; runtime not tested.

## How to judge the result

| Check | Good sign |
| --- | --- |
| Snapshot | Built only from your input; gaps marked UNKNOWN |
| Table | Every row names both the AI draft and your review |
| Assessment | Format decisions appear as human-only items |
| Questions | Gaps become questions, not assumptions |
| Privacy | Note present, no invented tool capability |

## FAQ

**Do I need any special tool or setup?** No. Any ordinary AI chat that accepts text works; you paste the prompt and your details as one message.

**What if I haven't decided my assessment yet?** Write "not decided". The prompt places the format decision on your side and asks it as an open question instead of inventing one.

## Attribution

The prompt and its Chinese translation are appended separately. Reference announcement for context: [ChatGPT release notes](<https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes>), reviewed 2026-10-04. Original TokRepo prompt, CC BY 4.0; the external reference keeps its own rights.

## Complete reusable prompt

You are helping me document a reusable AI-assist workflow for planning one lesson. I will paste my raw lesson information. Your job is to turn it into a step-by-step workflow that names, for every step, whether I must personally review or decide it, or whether an AI draft is acceptable as a starting point.

MY INPUT (paste below the heading):
1. Lesson topic and target learners (age/level, class size).
2. Duration of the lesson.
3. My learning goals, in my own words.
4. Materials and constraints I actually have (time, devices, room, rules).
5. Any known student needs I am allowed to share. Do not invent names, diagnoses, or personal data. If I include personal data, treat it as private and do not repeat it in the output.
6. Assessment I plan to use, or "not decided".
7. What I find hardest about planning this lesson.

TASK:
Produce a documented workflow with these parts, in this order:
A. Lesson snapshot: one short paragraph built only from my input, with blank fields marked UNKNOWN rather than guessed.
B. Workflow table with columns: Step number | Step name | What the AI may draft | What I must personally review or decide | Why that gate belongs to me | Input needed from me.
   Include 6-10 steps that cover planning, materials, differentiation, assessment, and post-lesson review.
C. Human-only list: every item from the table that I must personally review or decide, collected as a short numbered checklist.
D. AI-draftable list: items where a draft is a reasonable starting point, each with the exact input I should supply before asking for a draft.
E. Open questions: things I must answer before drafting anything, listed as questions, not assumptions.
F. Privacy and boundary note: state clearly that pasting text into an AI tool does not give it access to my accounts, files, or class records, and that any personal student information should be removed or handled according to my school's rules before I share it.

RULES:
- Never invent curriculum standards, student names, accommodations, assessment results, or school policies.
- If I did not state something, write UNKNOWN or ask a question; do not fill the gap.
- Keep tone direct and practical. No motivational filler.
- Do not tell me an AI tool can schedule work, send messages, or access my accounts on its own.

WORKED EXAMPLE (fictional, for shape only):
Input: "Topic: intro to fractions. Grade 4, 30 minutes. Goals: understand halves and quarters. Materials: paper strips, whiteboard. Hardest: making it visual."
Expected output shape: a snapshot with "Assessment: UNKNOWN"; a table where one row says the AI may draft three example questions, but I must personally decide whether they match what my class can already do; a human-only checklist starting with "Decide the final assessment format"; and an open question like "What prior knowledge can I assume?"

BEFORE YOU FINISH, CHECK YOUR OWN OUTPUT:
1. Does every row in the table name both what AI drafts and what I review?
2. Is every missing fact marked UNKNOWN or asked as a question?
3. Are all assessment and personal-need decisions on the human side?
4. Does the privacy note appear without inventing any tool capability?
If any check fails, fix the output before returning it.

## References and reuse

- [ChatGPT release notes](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes) · Reviewed 2026-10-04

Original TokRepo prompt · [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Reference documents retain their own rights.

---

<!-- ZH -->

# 教案规划 AI 协作流程：标明人工审核环节

一个可复用提示词，把你的课程信息整理成流程表，标明哪些步骤可由 AI 起草、哪些必须由你亲自判断。

## 开始使用

打开 AI 对话前，先备齐信息：课题与学习者、课时长度、用你自己的话说出的目标、实际拥有的材料与限制、可以分享的学生需求、你的评估计划（或“未确定”），以及你觉得最难的地方。

把提示词粘贴到能接受文本的普通 AI 聊天输入框，然后在你输入内容的标题下方粘贴你的课程信息，一次发送。不需要终端、安装或连接任何账号。

拿到结果后对照你自己的输入检查：任何缺失信息都应标注为 UNKNOWN 或写成问题，而不是被猜出来。评估方式和学生需求的决定必须留在你这一侧，隐私说明必须出现，且不能声称 AI 能访问你的账号、文件或班级记录。

## 这个提示词做什么

它把你的原始课程笔记整理成含六个部分的流程文档：一段情况概述、一张流程表（步骤编号 | 步骤名称 | AI 可起草什么 | 我必须亲自审核或决定什么 | 为什么这个把关属于我 | 需要我提供的输入）、一份仅限人工的清单、一份可交由 AI 起草的清单及每项所需输入、待解问题，以及安全边界说明。

流程表是核心：覆盖规划、材料、差异化、评估和课后复盘的 6–10 个步骤，每步都同时写明可起草的部分和必须由你保留的部分。

## 粘贴前须知

- 只使用你有权分享的学生信息。先去掉姓名和诊断信息，或干脆不填该项。
- 你的输入只属于你和你所在机构的规定；提示词要求模型不要在输出中重复个人数据。
- 这是文本层面的规划辅助。它不会安排日程、发送消息，也接触不到你的账号、文件或班级记录。
- 已审阅原始来源；未做运行测试。

## 如何判断结果

| 检查点 | 好结果的迹象 |
| --- | --- |
| 情况概述 | 只基于你的输入；空缺标注 UNKNOWN |
| 流程表 | 每行都同时写明 AI 起草内容与你的审核内容 |
| 评估 | 评估方式的决定出现在仅限人工的清单里 |
| 问题 | 空缺变成问题，而非假设 |
| 隐私 | 说明到位，未虚构工具能力 |

## 常见问题

**需要专用工具或配置吗？** 不需要。任何能接受文本的普通 AI 聊天都可以，把提示词和你的课程信息作为一条消息粘贴进去即可。

**如果还没想好怎么评估呢？** 写“未确定”。提示词会把评估方式的选择留在你这一侧，并作为待解问题提出，而不是替你编一个。

## 来源与致谢

提示词及其中文译文单独附后。作为背景参考的公告： [ChatGPT release notes](<https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes>)，审阅于 2026-10-04。本提示词为 TokRepo 原创，采用 CC BY 4.0；外部参考资料保留其自身权利。

## 完整可复制提示词

你正在帮我把规划一节课的可复用 AI 辅助流程整理成文档。我会粘贴我的原始课程信息。你的任务是把这些信息整理成一份分步流程，并在每一步都写明：哪些必须由我亲自审核或决定，哪些可以先接受 AI 草稿作为起点。

我的输入（粘贴在标题下方）：
1. 课程主题与目标学习者（年龄/水平、班级人数）。
2. 课时长度。
3. 用我自己的话写出的学习目标。
4. 我实际拥有的材料与限制（时间、设备、教室、规则）。
5. 我可以分享的已知学生需求。不要编造姓名、诊断信息或个人数据。如果我包含个人数据，请将其视为隐私，不要在输出中重复。
6. 我计划使用的评估方式，或“未确定”。
7. 我在规划这节课时觉得最难的地方。

任务：
按以下顺序生成一份含这些部分的流程文档：
A. 课程概况：仅根据我的输入写出一段简短概述，空白字段标注为 UNKNOWN，而不是猜测。
B. 流程表，列包括：步骤编号 | 步骤名称 | AI 可起草什么 | 我必须亲自审核或决定什么 | 为什么这个把关属于我 | 需要我提供的输入。
   包含 6–10 个步骤，覆盖规划、材料、差异化、评估和课后复盘。
C. 仅限人工清单：把表中所有必须由我亲自审核或决定的事项，整理成一份简短的编号清单。
D. 可交由 AI 起草清单：适合以草稿作为合理起点的项目，每项都要写明在请求起草前我应该提供的准确输入。
E. 待解问题：在起草任何内容前我必须回答的事项，列成问题，而非假设。
F. 隐私与边界说明：明确说明，将文本粘贴到 AI 工具并不会让它访问我的账号、文件或班级记录；任何学生个人信息在分享前都应删除，或按我所在学校的规定处理。

规则：
- 绝不要编造课程标准、学生姓名、便利安排、评估结果或学校政策。
- 如果我没有说明某件事，就写 UNKNOWN 或提出问题；不要填补空缺。
- 保持直接、实用的语气。不要激励式填充内容。
- 不要告诉我 AI 工具可以自行安排工作、发送消息或访问我的账号。

示例（虚构，仅说明形式）：
输入：“主题：分数入门。四年级，30 分钟。目标：理解一半和四分之一。材料：纸条、白板。最难：让它可视化。”
预期输出形式：概况中写有“评估：UNKNOWN”；流程表中有一行写明 AI 可以起草三个示例问题，但我必须亲自决定它们是否符合我班级当前已掌握的内容；仅限人工清单以“决定最终评估方式”开头；并包含一个像“我可以假定学生具备哪些先备知识？”这样的待解问题。

完成前，请检查你自己的输出：
1. 表中每一行是否都同时写明 AI 起草什么以及我审核什么？
2. 每个缺失的事实是否都标注为 UNKNOWN 或作为问题提出？
3. 所有评估和个人需求决定是否都在人工一侧？
4. 隐私说明是否出现，且没有虚构任何工具能力？
如果有任何检查未通过，请先修正输出再返回。

## 参考资料与复用

- [ChatGPT release notes](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes) · Reviewed 2026-10-04

TokRepo 原创提示词 · [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。参考资料保留各自原有权利。

---
Source: https://tokrepo.com/en/workflows/lesson-planning-ai-workflow-human-review-gates-1223ea09
Author: Prompt Lab