# Turn a Lecture Transcript into Study Cards

> Paste this prompt to turn your lecture transcript into question-first spaced-repetition cards, with a 7-day review plan and source-checkable answers.

## Install

Copy the content below into your project:

# Turn a Lecture Transcript into Study Cards

Paste this prompt to turn your lecture transcript into question-first spaced-repetition cards, with a 7-day review plan and source-checkable answers.

## Start here

Paste three things into an ordinary AI chat that accepts text: (1) the lecture transcript, (2) the course or unit name (optional), (3) any topics you want emphasized (optional). Then paste the full prompt below the transcript.

If the transcript is very long, the prompt will ask you to split it by section. Do that instead of trimming it silently.

**How to check the output**

- Every card back should contain a phrase you can find in your transcript. Search the transcript for it.
- Cards tagged `[gap]` should say "Needs source..." instead of an invented answer.
- Administrative lines (deadlines, room changes) should be skipped and reported as skipped.
- Card count should be 3-8. If higher, the prompt asks you which concepts to merge.

## What this prompt does

It converts a raw transcript into question-first spaced-repetition cards, each with a front question, a short back answer drawn only from the transcript, a transcript anchor, a confidence tag (`[clear]`, `[partial]`, `[gap]`), and a one-line note on why the concept matters for the unit. It also produces a 7-day review plan and a "Verify before studying" list.

## Prerequisites and permissions

No account setup, terminal or API is needed. You only need the transcript text and a chat window. The prompt works from text you supply in the conversation; it does not open files, browse, or read course platforms on its own. It does not enroll you, submit work, save files, or contact anyone, and it does not guarantee exam results.

## Limitations

- Answers are limited to what your transcript states. A missing detail becomes a `[gap]` card, not a guess.
- Transcripts with unclear audio, mixed languages or heavy filler produce weaker cards.
- The review schedule is a draft you adjust, not a fixed study prescription.
- Always verify cards against your instructor's slides or assigned reading.

## FAQ

**Do I need to upload the lecture file?**
No. Copy the transcript text into the chat. If you have no transcript, this prompt cannot work.

**What do I do with the `[gap]` cards?**
Ask your instructor or check the assigned reading, then rewrite the card yourself once you have the answer.

## Verification note

Source reviewed; runtime not tested. The prompt text is the original TokRepo prompt (CC BY 4.0). A reference link to ChatGPT release notes is context only and is not proof of any specific provider feature.

## Source and thanks

Original TokRepo prompt, licensed CC BY 4.0. Reference material retains its own rights. Thanks to the study-methods framing behind the original prompt.

## Complete reusable prompt

Role: You are a study-methods assistant helping a student convert a raw lecture transcript into spaced-repetition cards. You work only from text the student supplies in this conversation. You cannot open files, browse the web, or read course platforms on your own.

Input I will paste below:
1. The lecture transcript (or a section of it).
2. The course or unit name (optional).
3. Any specific topics I want emphasized (optional).

If any required input is missing, incomplete, or unreadable, stop and list exactly what you need before proceeding. If the transcript is too long for one pass, tell me and ask me to split it by section.

Task:
Step 1. List the 3-8 main concepts actually stated in the transcript. Do not add outside facts, definitions, or examples.
Step 2. Write one spaced-repetition card per concept. Each card must have:
   - Card number and concept label
   - Front (question-first, framed as a prompt to retrieve, not a yes/no question)
   - Back (answer written only from transcript content, in one or two sentences)
   - Transcript anchor (the phrase or line in the transcript the answer comes from)
   - Confidence tag: [clear] if the transcript states it plainly, [partial] if the transcript hints but does not fully state it, [gap] if the concept is mentioned but the transcript gives no usable answer
Step 3. For every [gap] card, write "Needs source: ask instructor or check assigned reading" instead of inventing an answer.
Step 4. Add one short note per card on why that concept matters for the unit, drawn from the transcript only.
Step 5. Create a 7-day review plan: which card numbers to review on day 1, day 2, day 4, and day 7, based on the confidence tags. Never schedule a [gap] card as if it were answerable.

Output format:
- Header: unit name, transcript section, total card count, count of clear/partial/gap cards.
- Table or numbered list of cards in the five-part structure above.
- Review plan table with day number and card numbers.
- A short "Verify before studying" list naming every card the student should check against the actual lecture slides or textbook.

Handling uncertainty:
- If a concept could be interpreted two ways, show both readings and mark the card [partial].
- If the transcript contradicts itself, show both versions side by side and mark [partial].
- If a section is mostly administrative talk (deadlines, room changes), skip it and say so.

Before any action outside this chat: do not claim to send these cards anywhere, save files, or contact anyone. You are producing a draft the student will copy into their own flashcard app or notes. State this limitation in the output header.

Review checks I will run:
1. Does every back answer contain a phrase I can find in the transcript? If not, the card fails.
2. Does any card use facts not in the transcript? If yes, delete or mark it [gap].
3. Are the front questions answerable without seeing the back? If a question is vague, rewrite it.
4. Does the review plan avoid treating [gap] cards as study-ready?
5. Is the card count between 3 and 8? If higher, ask me which concepts to merge.

Tone: plain, direct, no filler. Do not praise the lecture. Do not add motivational language. Keep cards short enough to fit a standard flashcard app.

Fictional example input:
Unit: Biology 101, Lecture 4 on cell transport. Transcript excerpt: "Today we covered diffusion, which is movement of particles from high to low concentration. Osmosis is a special case involving water across a membrane. Active transport goes against the gradient and needs energy. Don't forget the lab report is due Friday and the room changed to B204."

Illustrative output shape:
Concept: Diffusion. Front: "What is diffusion and which direction do particles move?" Back: "Movement of particles from high to low concentration." Anchor: "diffusion, which is movement of particles from high to low concentration." Confidence: [clear]. Why it matters: foundation for comparing other transport types.
Concept: Energy source for active transport. Front: "What does active transport require that diffusion does not?" Back: [gap] - transcript mentions energy but not the specific molecule. Needs source. Confidence: [gap].
Note: administrative lines about the lab report and room change are skipped as non-conceptual.

Pass/fail checks for this example:
- Pass if the diffusion card's back quote matches the transcript phrase exactly.
- Pass if the active-transport card is marked [gap] rather than filled with an invented molecule name.
- Fail if the room change appears as a study card.
- Fail if any card claims a fact such as "active transport uses ATP" that the excerpt does not state.

Boundaries: This prompt prepares a study draft only. It does not enroll you, submit work, or guarantee exam results. Always verify against your instructor's materials.

## References and reuse

- [ChatGPT release notes](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes) · Reviewed 2026-10-04

Original TokRepo prompt · [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Reference documents retain their own rights.

---

<!-- ZH -->

# 把课堂转录稿变成间隔复习卡片

粘贴这段提示词，把你的课堂转录稿整理成以提问为主的间隔复习卡片，附 7 天复习计划和可在原文核对的答案。

## 开始使用

把一个能接受文本的普通 AI 聊天窗口打开，粘贴三样东西：（1）课堂转录稿，（2）课程或单元名称（可选），（3）你想重点强调的主题（可选）。然后在转录稿下方粘贴完整的提示词。

如果转录稿很长，提示词会要求你按小节拆分。请照做，不要悄悄删减内容。

**怎么检查输出**

- 每张卡片背面的答案里，应当包含你能在转录稿里搜到的一句话。用关键词在转录稿中搜索验证。
- 标记为 `[gap]` 的卡片应当写"Needs source..."，而不是编造答案。
- 事务性内容（截止日期、教室变更）应当被跳过，并说明跳过了。
- 卡片数量应为 3-8 张。如果超过，提示词会问你要合并哪些概念。

## 这个提示词做什么

它把原始转录稿转换成以提问为主的间隔复习卡片：每张卡片包含正面问题、仅来自转录稿的简短答案、转录稿锚点、置信标签（`[clear]`、`[partial]`、`[gap]`），以及一句说明该概念为何对本单元重要。它还会给出 7 天复习计划和"复习前需核对"清单。

## 前提与权限

不需要注册、终端或 API，只需要转录稿文本和一个聊天窗口。提示词只处理你在对话中提供的文本，不会自行打开文件、浏览网页或读取课程平台。它不会替你选课、交作业、保存文件或联系任何人，也不保证考试结果。

## 使用限制

- 答案只限于转录稿中写到的内容。缺失的细节会成为 `[gap]` 卡片，而不是猜测。
- 录音不清、中英混杂或填充词过多的转录稿，生成的卡片质量较差。
- 复习计划只是草稿，需要你自己调整，不是固定的学习处方。
- 所有卡片都要对照老师的课件或指定阅读材料核实。

## 常见问题

**需要上传课堂录音文件吗？**
不需要。把转录稿文本复制进对话即可。如果没有任何转录稿，这个提示词无法工作。

**`[gap]` 卡片该怎么处理？**
去问老师或查指定阅读材料，拿到答案后再自己改写这张卡片。

## 核实说明

来源已审阅；运行时未测试。提示词文本为 TokRepo 原创提示词（CC BY 4.0）。ChatGPT 版本说明链接仅供参考，不能证明任何具体服务商功能。

## 来源与致谢

TokRepo 原创提示词，采用 CC BY 4.0 许可。外部参考资料保留其自身权利。感谢该提示词背后的学习方法框架。

## 完整可复制提示词

角色：你是一名学习方法的助手，帮助一名学生把原始的课堂转录稿转换成间隔复习卡片。你只根据学生在本次对话中提供的文本工作。你不能自行打开文件、浏览网络或读取课程平台。

我将粘贴到下方的输入：
1. 课堂转录稿（或其某个小节）。
2. 课程或单元名称（可选）。
3. 我任何想要重点强调的具体主题（可选）。

如果任何必需输入缺失、不完整或无法辨认，请停下，并在继续之前准确列出你还需要什么。如果转录稿太长，无法一次处理完，请告诉我，并让我按小节拆分。

任务：
第 1 步。列出转录稿中实际陈述的 3-8 个主要概念。不要加入外部事实、定义或例子。
第 2 步。为每个概念写一张间隔复习卡片。每张卡片必须包含：
   - 卡片编号和概念标签
   - 正面（以提问为主，写成用于提取记忆的提示，而不是是非题）
   - 背面（答案只根据转录稿内容写成，用一两句话）
   - 转录稿锚点（答案所来自的转录稿中的短语或句子）
   - 置信标签：如果转录稿明确陈述，则为 [clear]；如果转录稿只是暗示但没有完整陈述，则为 [partial]；如果提到了该概念但转录稿没有给出可用答案，则为 [gap]
第 3 步。对于每张 [gap] 卡片，写“Needs source: ask instructor or check assigned reading”，而不是编造答案。
第 4 步。为每张卡片加一条简短说明，解释该概念为何对本单元重要，且只依据转录稿。
第 5 步。创建一个 7 天复习计划：根据置信标签，说明第 1 天、第 2 天、第 4 天和第 7 天分别复习哪些卡片编号。绝不要把 [gap] 卡片安排得好像它已经可以作答。

输出格式：
- 页眉：单元名称、转录稿小节、卡片总数、clear/partial/gap 卡片数量。
- 按上述五部分结构呈现的卡片表格或编号列表。
- 复习计划表，包含天数编号和卡片编号。
- 一个简短的“复习前需核对”清单，列出学生应当对照实际课堂幻灯片或教材核实的每一张卡片。

处理不确定性：
- 如果一个概念可以有两种解释，请展示两种读法，并把卡片标记为 [partial]。
- 如果转录稿自相矛盾，请并排展示两个版本，并标记为 [partial]。
- 如果某个小节主要是事务性内容（截止日期、教室变更），请跳过它，并说明你跳过了。

在本次聊天之外采取任何行动之前：不要声称已把这些卡片发送到任何地方、保存文件或联系任何人。你正在生成一份草稿，学生会把它复制到自己的抽认卡应用或笔记中。请在输出页眉中说明这一限制。

我将运行的审核检查：
1. 每个背面答案是否都包含一句我能在转录稿中找到的话？如果没有，该卡片不合格。
2. 是否有任何卡片使用了转录稿中没有的事实？如果有，删除它或标记为 [gap]。
3. 正面问题是否在不看背面的情况下也能回答？如果某个问题含糊，请重写它。
4. 复习计划是否避免把 [gap] 卡片当作已可学习？
5. 卡片数量是否在 3 到 8 张之间？如果超过，请问我哪些概念要合并。

语气：平实、直接、不要填充话。不要夸奖课堂。不要加入励志语言。卡片要足够短，能放进标准抽认卡应用。

虚构示例输入：
单元：Biology 101，第 4 讲：细胞运输。转录稿摘录：“今天我们讲了扩散，也就是粒子从高浓度向低浓度的运动。渗透是一个特例，涉及水跨膜运动。主动运输逆浓度梯度进行，并且需要能量。别忘了实验报告周五截止，教室改到 B204。”

示例输出形态：
概念：扩散。正面：“什么是扩散，粒子朝哪个方向移动？”背面：“粒子从高浓度向低浓度移动。”锚点：“扩散，即粒子从高浓度向低浓度移动。”置信度：[clear]。为何重要：比较其他运输类型的基础。
概念：主动运输的能量来源。正面：“主动运输需要什么，而扩散不需要？”背面：[gap]——转录稿提到了能量，但没有提到具体分子。需要来源。置信度：[gap]。
注：关于实验报告和教室变更的事务性内容被作为非概念性内容跳过。

此示例的通过/不通过检查：
- 若扩散卡片背面的引文与转录稿中的短语完全一致，则通过。
- 若主动运输卡片被标记为 [gap]，而不是填入编造的分子名称，则通过。
- 若教室变更作为学习卡片出现，则不通过。
- 若任何卡片声称摘录中未陈述的事实，例如“主动运输使用 ATP”，则不通过。

边界：此提示词仅用于准备学习草稿。它不会替你选课、提交作业或保证考试结果。务必对照老师的材料核实。

## 参考资料与复用

- [ChatGPT release notes](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes) · Reviewed 2026-10-04

TokRepo 原创提示词 · [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。参考资料保留各自原有权利。

---
Source: https://tokrepo.com/en/workflows/turn-lecture-transcript-into-study-cards-585e76f2
Author: Prompt Lab