AI Agent Design Patterns — Architecture Guide 2026
Catalog of proven design patterns for building AI agents: ReAct, Plan-and-Execute, Reflection, Tool Use, Multi-Agent, Human-in-the-Loop, and more. With architecture diagrams and code examples.
What it is
This resource is a curated catalog of design patterns for building AI agents. It covers the architectural approaches that have emerged as standard practice: ReAct (reason + act), Plan-and-Execute, Reflection loops, Tool Use, Multi-Agent orchestration, and Human-in-the-Loop control flows. Each pattern includes when to use it, how it works, and implementation guidance.
The guide targets AI engineers, developers building agent systems, and architects deciding which patterns fit their use case. It provides a decision framework rather than promoting a single approach.
How it saves time or tokens
Building an AI agent without understanding established patterns leads to reinventing solutions that the community has already refined. This catalog maps task types to appropriate patterns, so you pick the right architecture from the start instead of discovering its limitations mid-project. Choosing the correct pattern also minimizes wasted LLM tokens -- a ReAct agent uses fewer tokens than Plan-and-Execute for simple tasks, while multi-step projects need the planning overhead.
How to use
- Identify your task complexity using the decision table:
| Task Type | Recommended Pattern |
|---|---|
| Simple Q&A with tools | ReAct |
| Multi-step projects | Plan-and-Execute |
| Self-improving output | Reflection |
| Specialized subtasks | Multi-Agent |
| Safety-critical flows | Human-in-the-Loop |
- Study the pattern description, architecture diagram, and code example.
- Implement using your preferred framework (LangGraph, OpenAI Agents SDK, CrewAI, etc.).
Example
# ReAct pattern: Reason -> Act -> Observe -> Repeat
def react_agent(query, tools, max_steps=5):
messages = [{'role': 'user', 'content': query}]
for step in range(max_steps):
response = llm.chat(messages, tools=tools)
if response.tool_calls:
for call in response.tool_calls:
result = execute_tool(call)
messages.append({'role': 'tool', 'content': result})
else:
return response.content
return 'Max steps reached'
Related on TokRepo
- Multi-Agent Frameworks -- Compare frameworks for building multi-agent systems
- AI Tools for Agents -- Tools and libraries for building AI agents
Common pitfalls
- Over-engineering with multi-agent patterns when a single ReAct agent suffices. Start simple and add complexity only when the task demands it.
- Skipping the human-in-the-loop pattern for high-stakes decisions. Autonomous agents making irreversible actions (deploys, payments, emails) need approval gates.
- Ignoring token costs in reflection loops. Each reflection cycle consumes additional tokens. Set a maximum iteration count to prevent runaway costs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Start with ReAct. It covers most common use cases (question answering with tools, data lookup, simple automation). Move to Plan-and-Execute when tasks require multiple coordinated steps.
Yes. Production agents often combine patterns. A Plan-and-Execute agent might use ReAct for individual step execution and add a Reflection loop for quality checks. The patterns are composable building blocks.
LangGraph, OpenAI Agents SDK, CrewAI, AutoGen, and Semantic Kernel all implement variations of these patterns. The catalog is framework-agnostic -- understand the pattern first, then map it to your framework.
ReAct works step-by-step without an upfront plan. Plan-and-Execute creates a plan first, then executes steps. Use ReAct for tasks with 1-3 steps. Use Plan-and-Execute when the task requires coordinating 4+ steps or when order matters.
Reflection adds a self-critique step after the agent produces output. The agent reviews its own work, identifies issues, and iterates. This improves output quality at the cost of additional LLM calls per iteration.
Citations (3)
- ReAct Paper (Yao et al.)— ReAct pattern for reasoning and acting
- LangChain Plan-and-Execute Docs— Plan-and-Execute agent architecture
- Anthropic Agent Patterns— Agent design patterns overview
Related on TokRepo
Source & Thanks
Synthesized from LangChain, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Microsoft research on agent architectures.
Related: CrewAI, AutoGen, LangGraph, Smolagents, Engram