Main
- The repo treats QA skills as deployable artifacts, not abstract testing advice.
- Coverage is broader than one vendor: Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, OpenCode, and more all appear in the entry docs.
- Even at 58 stars, the install scripts and categorized workflows make it concretely useful.
FAQ
- Is this only for Cursor?: No. The README explicitly covers Codex, Claude Code, and other tools.
- Lowest-risk trial?: Copy one skill folder manually before running the all-tools installer.
- Why publish a smaller repo?: Because the install paths and QA building blocks are concrete.